This idea that handing out condoms will make young people promiscuous is just one branch of a pretty common myth about sexual behavior. Do you know what is even more ineffective in preventing unplanned pregnancies and STI transmission than improper condom usage? Examples include schools that made condoms available in baskets and vending machines, wherein there is absolutely no compelling of students, rather, the schools are simply providing an option.
It may cause some teens to become sexually active because young people will form the mis-impression that such behavior is a peer norm. Condoms in Schools Yes because The effectiveness of condoms is grossly exaggerated.
This variant of sex education encourages young people to abstain from sexual activity as a way to avoid pregnancy and disease.
While scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports the contention that condoms, when properly used, reduce the incidence of these problems, numerous critics fear that active encouragement of condom use advances the onset of sexual activity among young people.
However, debaters may just as easily consider broader educational programs instituted by governments to improve public health and population control. It is undeniable that the condom availability programs significantly increase the usage of condoms during intercourse, however, Con claims the very same programs also increase sexual activity.
I must also bring to light the fact that this debate is focused on making condoms available to students, not on the other elements present in these programs in which the topic of condom availability is only present.
Providing access to birth control empowers women with more control over their bodies. When schools that make condoms available to students are compared to similar schools that do not, it becomes clear that students who have access to condoms do not have more sex, but they are more likely to use condoms.
Here are some sample opinions: That is the parents job. School should focus on educating the children, which it is clearly failing to do. If not used properly, condoms can be highly ineffective.
Providing students with condoms actually encourages the earlier onset of sexual activity. With the state of womens health right now in Texas, I hope those girls have access to condoms at this point. We can only hope that as parents and other community members start to understand the research behind the suggestions they will come around, and that school administrators will also stand behind the guidelines.
Parents should not permit schools to usurp their proper role by manipulating the conduct of their children in such an outrageous manner. The site conveniently reports only portions of the program that, when taken out of context, seem to promote sexual activity.
The two methods of prevention are absolutely not mutually exclusive nor detrimental to one another; schools simply have the wisdom and experience to predict the behaviour of students and realize abstinence will never be the choice of all students and wisely present another option: Providing condoms to students in public education programs will reduce the incidence of underage pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.
Whatever happened to teaching our children to abstain?! There is a third option that is prevalent in many high schools: Condom distribution encourages the responsibility of men and increases choices for women.
Presenting condoms to students in a publicly funded environment presents a potential offence to people from a variety of religions. Therefore, it has been clearly shown once again that making condoms available does not lead to a total increase in sexual activity; rather it leads only to an increase in protected sexual activity, which is the end goal of sexual education programs.
The analysis found that these programs increased condom use, the acquisition of condoms, and condom carrying. The cost of treating a patient with HIV can be enormous.
As Rewire has noted in the pastthese arguments have been disproven time and time again. They also delayed sexual initiation and reduced the incidence of STDs.
However, Con will probably disagree, and thus I will respond. Such an approach is wise because it accepts the inevitability that some young people, regardless of the strength of an abstinence message, will still have sex.
Subscribe to our daily or weekly digest. Historically women have often suffered more because of restrictive policies related to reproduction abortion laws, restrictions on birth control purchases, parental consent policies. In the developed world commercial influences and social pressures contribute to student defiance of abstinence.
Taxpayers should not have to support programs that they find morally objectionable, even if there seem to be pragmatic justifications for the action.
From the very same source Con obtains his facts the Alan Guttmacher InstituteI have already shown in my previous round that in studies of several high schools in Philadelphia and Massachusetts that absolutely no study has conclusively shown the making of contraceptives available to teens leads to increased sexual activity.Should condoms be distributed in schools?
48% Say Yes 52% Say No Are you a goose Are you a goose. Teenagers in school are going to have sex regardless on whether or not we have a condom, as long as the pull out game is strong theres not going to be a problem is there?
Now with the argument of underage pregnancies and STDs. In 98 percent of schools with condom availability programs, students may receive counseling. Lieberman L, Ward D, et al. Condom availability in New York City public high schools: relationships to condom use and sexual behavior.
Am J Public Fanburg JT, Kaplan DW, Naylor KE. Student opinions of condom distribution at a Denver. Condoms in Schools: A Smart Move, But a Tough Sell. Sep 12, Brett Kavanaugh killarney10mile.com Union News. it’s been used as an argument against most aspects of sexual health.
American Academy of Pediatrics and condoms, Barrier methods, condom availability in schools, Condoms, Male condoms, Promiscuity, San Antonio. Those that favor condom distribution say that distributing them will ensure teenagers practice safe sex, and the rate of teenage pregnancy will decline dramatically.
Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays] Good Essays words | ( pages - The Condom Distribution Debate The topic of condom distribution in public schools. Condom distribution encourages the responsibility of men and increases choices for women.
It can also establish condom use as the norm, not something that women continually have to negotiate, often from a position of weakness.
condoms should not be distributed in schools because if they distribute condoms in schools they are simply. Free Essay: The Condom Distribution Debate The topic of condom distribution in public schools has caused many heated debates throughout our country in the.Download